And 2020 is almost gone by…, with the smoke of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath unable to completely shade the escalating impacts of climate change.
CO2 emissions in 2020 have been high. Despite an
estimated 7% reduction of energy-related emissions because of the pandemic, LULUCF (Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry)
emissions have likely maintained its increasing trend with forests around the
world burning as a consequence of global warming, poor management and irresponsible
extractive policies. If we assume last year’s trend in LULUCF emissions is
maintained, global CO2 emissions in 2020 will be around 41 GtCO2/y, a
barely 4% reduction from 2019.
Hence, the clock keeps ticking and the available carbon
budget for any transition roadmap starting in 2021 will be reduced from the one
that was available in 2020.
Figure-1 presents the 2021 carbon budget as function of global
warming and the likelihood to limit global warming at these values. These
carbon budgets have been derived from the IPCC 1.5SR (which provides 2018 carbon budgets), updated
with the 2018, 2019 and 2020 CO2 remissions (from the Global Carbon
Project, except for 2020 emissions that have been estimated assuming a 7%
reduction in energy-related emissions and a trending evolution of LULUCF
emissions), including the conservative estimate for earth system feedbacks
reported in the IPCC 1.5SR and the estimate of the impact from the 2019 updated
UK’s Met Office sea surface temperature (SST) database (HadSST4). In order to
estimate the impact from the SST database update, we used the transient climate
response to cumulative carbon emissions (TRCE) for each likelihood derived from
the IPCC SR1.5.
Figure-1: Remaining carbon budgets for 2021, as function of
global warming for different likelihoods (33%, 50% and 67%)
As Figure-1 shows, the remaining carbon budget for keeping
global warming below 1.5oC is quickly shrinking.
The 2021 carbon budget is the yardstick against which the cumulative emissions from any transition roadmap should be compared in order to check its climate consistency. As Figure-2 shows, this means that in order to have a 50% likelihood (the flip of a coin) to limit global warming to 1.5oC, cumulative emissions from 2021 to 2100 should be below 250 GtCO2. If the likelihood of success is increased to 67% (which should be a minimum policy goal in the face of the increased climate damages if warming goes beyond 1.5oC), cumulative emissions should be below 109 GtCO2.
Figure-2: The carbon budget is the measuring stick to check the climate consistency of transition roadmaps. As of 2021, consistency with 1.5oC global warming requires limiting cumulative emissions to 250 GtCO2 if a 50% likelihood of success is the policy goal, but to 109 GtCO2 if likelihood of success is increased to 67%.
Gracias por esto, sin un nuevo tweet del profesor Kevin Anderson no sabría que existe. Vivo en Barcelona y mi encuentro más reciente con el negacionismo vino del Ayuntamiento de Barcelona durante su consulta "Emergencia climática". Había pensado que aquí se produciría una consulta "progresiva", lamentablemente no. Sus ideas están llenas de "desacoplamiento, compensaciones de carbono" y la triste creencia de que todavía "tenemos tiempo". Parece que incluso en un entorno laboral "feminista" el "giro" es nuetral de género.
ResponderEliminarA los 70 años y 30 años de participación, siento que mi activismo está muriendo lentamente, espero que seas joven y no demasiado cansado y, sobre todo, que no estés solo. Mantén vivo tu blog, comencé el mío en 2011 cuando comencé a vivir en Barcelona, https://awayfromitall.me/